Building Unified Financial Visions

Can Sally (our national sales leader) buy phantom stock from the company? Is such a thing possible?

In fact, we can sell Sally phantom shares. Let’s see how it would work.

This is referred to as a Deferred Stock Unit plan—a form of deferred compensation. Sally would be given the opportunity to defer some of her cash compensation (e.g., salary or bonus) into units of phantom stock. Said differently, Sally would “convert” some of her future pay to phantom stock.

An example: Assume Sally makes $200,000 in annual salary. She might defer up to 25% (or more, or less) of her salary into the plan. Assuming she does so she would acquire a deferred compensation interest that would have $50,000 worth of starting value. In other words, she would have 5,000 units of phantom stock (at $10/share) credited to her deferred comp account.

In reality, you’re not selling shares to her. That is, she’s not acquiring an ownership right in exchange for writing you a check. She’s deferring some of her income into an unsecured bookkeeping account that is measured by the growth of the phantom share price. But it has the same essential effect as selling Sally phantom shares. She is voluntarily foregoing wages in order to ‘invest’ in the company! That’s a pretty serious commitment. We’re definitely building an ownership mentality.

Plus, it’s much better for Sally tax-wise than buying actual stock. Why? Because she gets to do it with pre-tax dollars.

Tax-wise for you it’s not perfect, but it’s not so bad. You (or the company) will forego the current tax deduction on the income Sally chooses to defer. However, it’s a delayed deduction, not a lost deduction. Instead, of getting the deduction today of $50,000 (wages) you’ll get the future deduction on $90,000 (assuming our EBITDA growth example given in my previous blog).

This is a pretty flexible and promising arrangement when you have employees who believe in the future of the company and an owner who’s willing to share that growth—for a price.

So we’ve agreed (haven’t we?) that some form of phantom stock is likely to be better for private businesses. I mentioned that there are
three types of plans that may fit. Here’s the first.

Full value grant. We could give Sally (our senior sales executive) some shares that are valued, in full, at $10 per unit. We’re going to specify some conditions and restrictions (to be discussed later). Nonetheless, we’re committing the full $10 in value times the number of shares we decide to give her. If we give her 5,000 shares she’ll start with a true value of $50,000 (subject to vesting and other restrictions). At some future date she’ll redeem those awards for real cash. Assuming EBITDA grows to $18mm (from $10mm) on her
redemption date, Sally will receive a check for $90,000.

What about Sally’s taxes? Well, remember that with actual stock awards Sally would pay taxes when she received the grant or when the vesting lapsed. With phantom awards, Sally pays no taxes until she actually receives her award value (e.g., the $90k). In this way, she
never has to pay income taxes until she’s in receipt of the actual cash. It’s true that had she received actual stock (and paid the taxes up front) she might have saved some taxes in the long run. However, with phantom stock your tax deduction (i.e., the company’s) is higher than it would have been with actual stock. In the first case (actual stock), your deduction was for $50,000, thus a tax benefit of $20,000 (assuming 40% bracket). With the phantom stock example, you get to deduct the full $90,000, resulting in a tax benefit of $36,000. If
you’re feeling guilty about Sally’s taxes go ahead and give her more shares, enough to result in your “after-tax cost” being the same.

A full-value award of phantom stock may be just right for Sally. But generally, we suggest it only for those special employees who have been involved with the company for some time (i.e., they’ve earned some of the value that exists now). There are better ways for most employees.

Next time: Can we sell phantom shares to employees?

In my last blog I began the discussion of phantom stock—and why it’s often better for the employer and the employees. Here’s how to go about establishing a plan.

  1. First, you must establish a way to value the phantom shares. In essence, you’re trying to identify the value of the company. You can obtain a formal appraisal or you can establish the value by a formula. The latter will work best in most
    situations. Perhaps the formula will reflect a multiple of EBITDA or Net Income. Any reasonable formula can work. To be safe, use a formula that is going to be less than the actual fair market value you might sell the company for some day. You don’t want the employees’ phantom shares to be valued higher than your own.
  2. The next step is to create some phantom shares. Pick a number—1 million, 10 million—the number doesn’t matter as long as you have enough to make the plan work with the number of eligible participants you anticipate. This part can sometimes seem confusing or cause concern. “Wait,” you might be thinking, “shouldn’t I use the same number of shares we have outstanding in the company? Aren’t I trying to ‘shadow’ the movement of actual stock?” Actually, no. We don’t like the term ‘shadow stock’ because we’re not trying to replicate actual shares. We’re simply trying to provide an attractive award for employees at a future date. As you’ll see, it doesn’t matter whether there are more or fewer shares
    in the plan than in your company. Let’s do an example using EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) as our value indictor:

EBITDA    $10,000,000

Multiple selected    5

Formula Value  $50,000,000

Shares selected     5,000,000

Starting share price    $10

    3. Now let’s design our plan. Remember that with actual stock plans we had three choices: (a) give shares, (b) sell shares,  or (c) give options (to buy in the future at today’s price). Guess what? We have the same three options. We can simply award Sally (our national sales leader) some phantom shares. Or we can “sell” her some. Or we can create a phantom option.

Coming up—we’ll look at all three of these options using phantom shares.

In my last three blogs I discussed why stock ownership for employees may not be such a good idea. So what’s better?

Phantom Stock—A Better Approach

Each of the ideas for Sally (our Sales VP) had merit. Granting stock is simple and clear-cut. It provides instant recognition and value. It’s great, particularly, for someone who’s been with you for awhile and has made a contribution to your past success. But, the concept carries the baggage we described.

Having Sally buy stock also is intriguing. It deepens her commitment and aligns her with both short-term and long-term goals of the company. But again, baggage.

Stock options are attractive because they’re win-win. Sally only wins if shareholders see their stock value go up. Sally is tied to future growth of the company. But…complexity, cash flow problems (i.e., baggage)

What if we could replicate any or all of these approaches without making Sally an actual owner? Is it possible to generate the ownership value and mentality without the baggage? In a word, yes. We can do it with phantom stock.

Phantom Stock Defined

A phantom stock plan is a contractual agreement wherein a company promises to make cash payments to employees upon the achievement of certain conditions. What’s the purpose? Just as with stock awards, the purpose of a phantom stock plan is to generate an ownership mentality and reward key employees for helping to grow the business value.

However, phantom stock has one big advantage—no sharing of actual equity with the employees. No requirement to open the books. No ownership rights. No need to pay dividends (although some plans do). The existing owners stay in control of 100% of the stock or interest in the company.

At the same time, phantom stock can create comparable or even identical value as actual stock. Next time I’ll outline some of the positive things that happen when you create a plan on behalf of employees–and the ways to do it right.

 

Tom Miller
January 24th, 2011 by Tom Miller

Is Phantom Stock Safe for Employees?

A few months ago I noticed an article in a Washington state newspaper describing a situation wherein employees were terminated from a bank and apparently did not receive payments owed under their phantom stock plan. The reporter states that the employer simply told the employees the bank “didn’t have the funds.”

So how safe is phantom stock?

First of all these plans are forms of deferred compensation and, as such, are subject to creditors of the corporation. If a plan sponsor goes bankrupt, chances of payment are very small. But this bank apparently did not go bankrupt. They simply terminated the services of the employees without making payment on the plan obligation. Assuming we’ve been told the whole story (perhaps a big assumption) this would appear to be a clear violation of the terms of a typical phantom stock agreement. The employees are suing and may have a pretty good case.

Nonetheless, any employee invited to participate in a phantom stock plan needs to be aware that they are not in a secured position. The plan promise is only as strong as the company behind it.

That said, careful companies play it smart. They “fund” their phantom stock plans. This means they set aside designated funds on the company’s books to be “earmarked” for payment of plan liabilities. These funds cannot be secured from creditors. And they can even be used for other company purposes. But they watch the funds carefully and manage them to assure (within reason) adequate liquidity for the plan.

If you have or consider a phantom stock plan (or any form of deferred compensation) informal funding is the wise choice. It’s prudent, cost effective and practical. And it may save you from a future lawsuit and bad press.

Tom Miller
January 13th, 2011 by Tom Miller

Why Phantom Stock is Better than Actual Stock

What do I mean by better? Phantom stock better aligns with shareholder goals. Wait! How can a cash-based plan (such as phantom stock) align better than actual stock? Shareholders hold actual stock. If employees own actual stock don’t we have perfect alignment? Typically not.

First of all most companies don’t usually grant stock, they grant stock options. Stock options pay off if the value of the stock increases but they don’t result in a reduction of value if the stock declines in value (from the initial strike price). Shareholders have an interest in preserving value, not just in increasing value. Thus, if the officers of a company own options they are not perfectly aligned with shareholders who, obviously, own actual stock. Shareholders are thinking “preserve and grow.” Managers are thinking “grow!”

Secondly, in a public environment stock prices are influenced by more than actual performance. They are influenced by what the market believes about future performance. If I own stock in your company I of course want people to believe the future value will be higher (especially if I want to sell the stock soon). However, over time, actual performance will tell the tale.

A phantom stock plan (properly designed) would not normally tie to market performance. It would tie to true performance indicators (typically some kind of profit multiple). Thus, true growth in profits over time would result in value for the phantom stock unit-holders.

By the way, it’s fine to structure the phantom stock as an “appreciation” plan (like with stock options) as long as it’s tied to true profit growth. Again, those results must be real, not just anticipated. That said, a “best practice” model would include both full-value phantom stock and appreciation rights held in a well-balanced structure.

Unfortunately, the accounting rules generally favor options over phantom stock rights. But, in my book, alignment trumps accounting any day.

Tom Miller
June 11th, 2010 by Tom Miller

What Think Ye of Phantom Stock? Does it Work?

Twenty years ago very few people were familiar with the concept of ‘phantom stock.’ Today, most business owners are familiar with the term—and many have strong opinions about whether they work or not. Do they?

 For a plan to  ‘work’ it should: (a) provide a meaningful reward for employees if the value of the company goes up over time, and (b) serve as an effective retention tool for key employees.

 I’ve designed a lot of phantom stock plans over the years. And I’ve seen many more that were put into place by others. I’ll offer up, first, some of the biggest mistakes I’ve seen in phantom stock plans. And in my next blog I’ll offer up the most innovative and effective practices that can make a plan, possibly, the most effective compensation plan you’ve ever utilized.

 Here are the top 5 mistakes to make when designing a phantom stock plan (if you really want to do it wrong):

  • Require that the plan valuation be determined by a formal appraisal. Result: significant, unnecessary, periodic expenses for the company.
  • Be sure to use the actual number of company shares for the number of shares in the phantom stock plan. Result: the plan will be very confusing and complicated whenever you try to conduct routine corporate shareholder transactions (redeem shares, issue new shares, etc.).
  • Issue “shares” in a block grant up front. Results: certain regrets later on when you realize you gave too much to some people and you have too few new shares to award to others; also, people will probably vest in all their shares before you really want them to.
  • Pay annual dividends to the “phantom shareholders.” Results: a completely unnecessary drain on company cash.; plus, no alignment or retention purposes whatsoever.
  • Have an attorney help you design the plan. Result: (with apologies to my attorney friends) this results in an overly technical plan without ‘real world’ practical and compelling provisions. (Tip–let the attorney document after the creative discussions have been conducted.)

These 5 steps will insure you years of headaches, regrets and costs. Any you’ll be sure to lower productivity, worsen retention and diminish shareholder value. In my book, that doesn’t ‘work.

 Next blog—best practices tips for plans that really work.