Building Unified Financial Visions

Ken Gibson
February 20th, 2012 by Ken Gibson

What Deserves to be Rewarded?

Every CEO or business owner has a unique set of  performance factors he or she wants executed which are considered crucial to the achievement of the company’s  growth goals.  However, in my view, more importantly there are  categories of outcomes that every company should have as a  focus regardless of their industry, size or niche.  Most specific key performance indicators that company leaders identify as a priority fall under one of those categories.  By defining  those areas of focus–and communicating (through pay systems and otherwise) why they are so critical to the future of the company–business leaders are better able to engineer rewards programs that will drive the outcomes they are seeking, and build a greater ownership mindset among those responsible for producing those results.

Conversely, if those areas of focus are not clearly defined, employees end up participating in a rewards plan that has little or no context.  They see it as a mechanism for increasing their compensation, but that’s all.  It might even  pay well, but the company will ultimately be frustrated with the results it is realizing if employees can’t connect their rewards to a broader fulfillment that is  being achieved.

Here’s what I mean by defining areas of focus within which individual compensation metrics, measures and plans can be constructed:

  • We reward innovation. Creativity and ingenuity are critical to our growth and so we are willing to share value with those whose innovations leverage our ability to multiply value for all stakeholders.
  • We reward sustained performance. Our growth depends upon the ability of the company to maintain then expand the virtuous cycles connected to our business model. Therefore, we share value with those that help us sustain and improve our revenue producing “engine.”
  • We reward  ”good” profits. Good profits come by delivering real value to the market place and protecting customer or client interests at all levels of interaction.  Bad profits are those that come at the expense of the customer or client relationship and experience or erode owner interests over time. We will share value with those who help create and grow good profits.

The list could go on but hopefully you get the idea. Unless employees are aware of these definitive priorities and outcomes they could technically qualify for a payout under an incentive plan without ever taking stewardship of key results the business needs them to perpetuate.  In the worst case, those same employees could pull the company in a direction that is at odds with the strategic direction it has charted (generating bad profits instead of good profits, for example).

So, as you examine your current pay practices, ask whether your rewards programs help define and fulfill the broader areas of focus your company needs to reinforce if its growth expectations are going to be realized.  If they don’t, you should consider making some serious changes.

Tom Miller
February 10th, 2012 by Tom Miller

The Rewards Pyramid–Checking on Alignment

How well do your employees understand the connection between your organization’s goals and their pay? Here’s an easy way to find out.

Ask them, one-by-one, to respond to four simple questions:

1. Where do you see the company headed?

2. What do you think are the essential things that must happen to achieve our best results?

3. What contribution do you expect to make to our success?

4. What do you personally hope to achieve or receive as a result?

These might be called the vision, strategy, contribution and rewards questions. I sometimes refer to them as the Rewards Pyramid.

There are lots of things to learn from this exercise, such as (a) how well do the employees’ responses align with the official vision and mission of the organization? (b) what role do they see themselves playing (if any) in the company’s success? and (c) what personal rewards are most important to them (money, position, opportunity)?

Without alignment, organizations simply don’t move forward. On the other had, when employees buy into a compelling vision, believe it can be achieved, see a growing role for themselves in it, and believe they will be rewarded fairly, you have an organization on track for success.

Tom Miller
February 8th, 2012 by Tom Miller

Should You Pay the Way Alaska Airlines Does?

A recent Wall Street Journal article (subscription may be required) highlighted the recent successes of Alaska Airlines—a standout in the struggling airline industry. The article, reflecting an interview with Alaska CEO Bill Ayer, stressed the steps the company has taken to grow value.

The part of the article I’d like to draw attention to relates to the way Ayer has reshaped the compensation philosophy and approach of the airline. I’ve selected one quote (broken into four statements) from the article and added my parenthetical observations. The article quote is in italics. My comments follow each sentence.

As part of its restructuring, Alaska put all staff in the bonus pool. (This is the first strong practice. Don’t limit your bonus plans to managers and supervisors. Get everyone on board.)

Bonuses are based on earnings (70%) and customer satisfaction, cost discipline and safety record (10% each). (Overall, a sound practice. Employees can clearly see what they can do to impact these indicators. I like the emphasis on earnings because it unites employees around the lifeblood of the business. They’ll need to be careful they don’t encourage employees to manipulate behavior just to earn the bonus. This could be counter-productive. As long as they’re careful, they’ve discovered a great formula.)

Each month, the company tells every sales agent or flight attendant how well the company is doing in the bonus categories. (This is rare. And it’s the key to the success of the plan. Few companies devote the time and effort needed to make the bonus plan work. Regular and ongoing communication is the most important step to take.)

We say we want to share generously during really good times, rather than lock in really high wages all the time, says Mr. Ayer. (Several positive things here. First, I like the term “share.” It suggests a partnership relationship. Secondly, the emphasis on modest fixed wages and generous variable bonuses is helpful to prevent high costs in tough times while encouraging meaningful upside during good times. Finally,
note the phrase, “we want to share generously.” The board and leaders have adopted the view that the more they pay the better off everyone will be.

Ayer has captured the essence of how a company can adopt a value sharing philosophy that emphasizes a true partnership relationship with employees. I’m not surprised Alaska Airlines is at or near the top of nearly every industry metric—and that their stock price rose 30% in 2011 while competitors were entering bankruptcy.

How you pay matters!

 

Tom Miller
February 2nd, 2012 by Tom Miller

Don’t Get Stuck Like Facebook Did

By now everyone’s aware that Facebook is preparing to launch its IPO—probably the biggest one ever. Founder Mark Zuckerberg has tried to keep the company private for as long as possible—presumably to preserve its nimbleness.

So why go public now? Obviously there are probably a lot of reasons. But one relates to the complexities of stock-based compensation. In the early stages of Facebook a number of employees received stock options, some of which have been converted to stock. But stock is worthless unless it can be converted to cash. This article summarizes the issue well. And here’s the pertinent quote:

“In 2010, Facebook banned employees from selling their stock, citing legal concerns around insider-trading rules. So, in an odd twist, the only way for early employees to cash out their vested stock options has been to leave the company.”  (Emphasis mine)

Employers are constantly doing this to themselves by not structuring their long-term incentive plans (be they equity or phantom) in the right way. You always want to enable employees to harvest the cash value of their LTIPs.

Phantom stock plans, for example, should have designated pay-out dates and should vest upon other timing events other than separation of employment. LTIPs are an essential part of any balanced compensation strategy. But do it right. Give employees the ability to extract the value from the plan before you discover that the plan is defeating the very purpose for which it was designed–retaining and rewarding premier talent.

Ken Gibson
January 31st, 2012 by Ken Gibson

Why Long-Term ‘Value Sharing’ Matters

The following post is an excerpt from a White Paper (with the same title) that VisionLink recently published.  To access the full article, click here.

Value sharing is an issue that, sooner or later, every enterprise leader must confront.  For example, many responsible for driving business growth wonder whether some kind of long-term incentive will enable higher performance; and if so, which approach is best—stock, performance units, phantom equity or some other value sharing plan.  This article offers five compelling reasons why long-term value sharing is critical for any company seeking breakthrough growth.

It is not the intent of this article to make a judgment about which long-term plan is most effective or to describe the advantages and disadvantages of different value sharing approaches.  Instead, we want to consider why such plans matter and how they make companies more productive while multiplying wealth for all stakeholders.

With that understanding as a “jumping off point,” let’s now move on to why long-term value sharing matters.

#1: Value Sharing Attracts the Best Talent and Magnifies Results

To achieve sustained success, companies must attract and keep talented people that know how to compete and are willing and able to assume a stewardship role in representing shareholder interests towards growth.  For such a relationship to be properly fostered, owners and other stakeholders (in this case, key talent) must share both the risks and the rewards associated with value creation.

Those of superior talent are attracted to this idea.  Individuals best equipped to contribute to the future success of the business will see it as an opportunity to have what amounts to a mini-entrepreneurial experience within the construct of someone else’s business model.  As such, they view the company as a mechanism for wealth creation, not just a place to express their passion and talent.  And shareholders should want employees with that perspective representing their interests.

#2: Effectively designed long-term value sharing plans reinforce the company’s business model

A sustainable business model depends, in large part, on a culture that is committed to and, ideally, “invested in” that model’s reinforcement and success. As a result, having key members of a workforce aligned financially with the business model makes both common and strategic sense.  The importance of this concept stems from the nature of the virtuous cycles (revenue perpetuation) the model is intended to produce.

Four Seasons, Verizon and Amazon each have distinct business models and, by extension, unique virtuous cycles.  So, it only stands to reason that their compensation strategies will be equally distinct.  The metrics and measures that stand as gate keepers to payouts (or earned shares, as the case may be) in each organization must reflect and reinforce the virtuous cycles relevant to that business.

# 3: Value Sharing Protects against Bad Profits and Promotes Good Profits

In his book The Ultimate Question, Fred Reichheld, a Bain Fellow and founder of Bain & Company’s Loyalty Practice, offers the following on the subject of profits:

“Whenever a customer feels misled, mistreated, ignored, or coerced, then profits from that customer are bad…Bad profits are about extracting value from customers, not creating value.” (The Ultimate Question, Fred Reichheld, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, 2006, 3-4.)

Long-term value sharing arrangements, if designed properly, become a self-enforcing means of perpetuating good profits.  Everyone has an interest in good profits if everyone’s wealth multiplier rises or falls on the ability of the company to sustain the right kind of profitability.

#4: Long-term value sharing promotes an ownership mindset

Businesses need employees in leadership roles that understand “what’s important.”  Such individuals must be able to embrace a stewardship role in aligning their focus with that of shareholders. They need to define what’s important in the same terms as ownership when they go about fulfilling their responsibilities.  For most companies, a list of “what’s important” would include, but not be limited to, the following:

  • Drive growth (revenue, net income, EBIDTA or other measures)
  • Improve margins/profits
  • Manage costs

Each of those areas of emphasis has long-term implications.  In that context, value sharing plays a key role in communicating “what’s important” and aligns key producers with ownership thinking.

#5: Value Sharing Builds Trust and Trust Accelerates Results

At its core, value sharing is about turning a company’s workforce into partners in building the future company.  A culture of confidence is rooted in an environment of trust.  Value sharing communicates and builds trust because, in part, it is a fair approach to rewarding those responsible for value creation—and trust is the key to accelerating results.  In his book The Speed of Trust, author Stephen M. R. Covey makes the case this way:

“Whether it’s high or low, trust is the “hidden variable” in the formula for organizational success.

“ …A company can have an excellent strategy and a strong ability to execute; but the net result can be torpedoed by a low-trust tax or multiplied by a high-trust dividend.  This makes a powerful business case for trust, assuring that it is not a soft, ‘nice to have’ quality.”  (The Speed of Trust, Stephen M. R. Covey, Free Press, February 2008)

When you pay people in a way that communicates you want them as partners in building the future business, you are, in essence, saying: “I have confidence in you and trust your ability to get results.  To prove it, I’m willing to share the value you help create.”

Start with a Clear Philosophy

Before considering which plan is “right,” wise leaders will begin with the development of a compensation philosophy that addresses how the company will nurture a culture of confidence through its approach to rewards. Such a philosophy should address the balance the company will maintain between short and long-term value sharing, and guaranteed versus at risk compensation.  Determining the plan that will best reflect that philosophy then becomes much easier.

 

Tom Miller
January 10th, 2012 by Tom Miller

Communicating Your Bonus Plan–the Right Way

How much financial detail should you provide employees about your bonus/incentive plan? We’ve always preached that for any incentive plan to be effective it needs to be (a) clear, (b) believable, and (c) meaningful.

Clarity relates to both (1) the plan itself, and (2) the results needed to earn the award and to maximize it. Most owners of private
companies are reluctant to disclose specific information about company profit results for fear that employees will misinterpret the information (i.e., conclude that this must be what the owner makes) or under-appreciate it (i.e., fail to realize that profits are the sustaining lifeblood of the organization).

Recently, a relatively new client of ours took the leap and fully disclosed to all employees exactly what the company profit-related goals are. Their new bonus plan is properly referred to as a “value sharing plan.” They explained to employees that the organization creates economic value when everyone works together as a team to achieve desired business results. And when those results are created everyone is eligible to participate in the sharing of that value.

(This is a progressive step forward. The terms “bonus” and “incentive” seem a little dated, don’t they?)

Time will tell how this impacts performance within this organization. I’m betting on continued productivity gains and  improvements. Being honest with employees about what business results are expected and enlisting their partnership efforts in achieving them is a critical step in accelerating business results to the next level.