Building Unified Financial Visions

Ken Gibson
May 24th, 2010 by Ken Gibson

Outcome-Based Compensation Design

Too often a company’s compensation strategy discussion begins in the wrong place.  It starts with questions about design or amounts.  This occurs because, in most instances, the company is just trying to solve a problem.  And usually, its hope is that there is a way to simply “plug the hole” that’s making the “dam leak” so they can move on to what’s really important.  When someone in such a circumstance calls us, this tendency is manifest pretty quickly.  Once we’ve listened to the issue and explained our process, the potential client reveals their frame of mind with a question that is set up something like this:

“So, how long will it take to work through your process?  We are coming up on our employee reviews in four weeks and we told them a while back we would be introducing a new bonus plan at that time.  Can we get this done by then?”

Such a question, while asked innocently enough, reveals much about how that company views compensation. It is an issue to be managed, not a strategic tool to drive certain results  in the business.  Seldom is the core problem a design issue.  It’s an alignment issue. This is because rewards planning is an outcome-based endeavor that needs to reinforce the strategic focus of the company.  A four-week excercise in re-engineering the bonus plan is not going to drive a different outcome for the business ,and year or two later the company will be back at square one trying to solve the problem all over again–and probably asking the same questions.  (What did Einstein say?  “We cannot solve our problems with the same level of thinking that was used to create them.”)

To avoid this tendency, let me suggest six steps that an outcome-based approach to compensation planning should include.

  1. Identify your company’s core strategy.  Reduce it to a one paragraph statement that everyone in the organization can recite.
  2. Define three to six strategic intiatives that have to be achieved if the strategy statement is going to be fulfilled.
  3. Identify where in the organization key decisions need to be made relative to those intiatives (department, team, pair, unit, division, subsidiary).
  4. Model what financial value (for shareholders) will be created if those initiatives are successfully carried out.
  5. Align the organizational roles with the strategic intiatives that have to be carried out if the value modeled is going to be achieved.
  6. Now approach compensation development in the framework of that broader strategy discussion.

Certainly, there are other pieces that need to be managed for the outcomes in question to be fulfilled.  A company needs to be able to identify key decisions the company needs to make.  It needs to organize its macro structure around sources of value.  It must figure out what level of authority decision makers need.  It has to align other elements of the organizational system, such as information flow and processes, with those related to decision making.  It must ultimately nurture a sense of stewardship and help those responsible develop the skills and behavior necessary to make and execute decisions quickly and well.   Incentives, then, and other elements of compensation, must become mechanisms for structuring the kind of “partnership” you will have with those responsible for the outcomes and how a unified financial vision within the company will be defined.  (For more information on the examples given in this paragraph, please see The Decision-Driven Organization in the June 2010 edition of the Harvard Business Journal. Marcia W. Blenko, Michael C. Mankins, and Paul Rogers, all of Bain and Company, are the authors.)

We are living in a business age of rapidly changing cycles where flexibility and decision making skills will make the difference between thriving, surviving and dying.  Compensation must be discussed in a framework that acknowledges that reality.  If it is, a company will find itself with a powerful rewards program that will allow it to attract the decision makers described above and move the company from a reactive problem solving mode to outcome-based achievement.

The execution gap—the bane of every CEO. “We have a good strategy, good people, good products. Why aren’t we getting the results we’re capable of?” Have you ever asked yourself that question (with or without the dangling preposition)?

Lots of books have been written about execution and the sometimes exasperating effort all businesses make to improve, refine, or enhance the execution of their business plan. Yet few CEOs are ever satisfied. When I ask them to describe their satisfaction with team execution they hesitate and hedge. “We’re pretty good, but we could do better,” might be the most common response.

I’ve come to learn that one can sense something about company cultures. It’s not something that’s there. It’s something that’s not there. And people are so busy trying to ‘execute’ that they don’t know what’s missing. It’s as if they believe that working harder will get them the results they want. In some cases, maybe it will.

But what is lacking is simpler, if not more elusive. We call it a “unified vision for growing the business.” This means that there is a consistent, meaningful, mutually respectful understanding between the owners (or their representatives) and the employees. This understanding works by the following formula.  Owners: “Help us achieve great results. We’re committed to sharing the financial rewards in an enriching way.” Employees: “We see the results you expect. We see how we can contribute. We appreciate your willingness to share value. We find this relationship compelling.”

When this partnership moves from philosophy to practice it changes organizations. Execution is no longer an elusive goal. It’s second nature.

Every business wants the best–the best product, the best customer service, the best possible profit margin, the best market position, and the best people.  Some actually achieve it.  How do they do it? 

From VisionLink’s point of view, there are four  essentials that a company must get right if it hopes to attract and retain a level of talent that can drive all the other “bests” it is trying to achieve.  We call these the Four Pillars of Total Rewards.  In summary, they are as follows:

  • Compelling Future
  • Positive Work Environment
  • Opportunities for Personal and Professional Development
  • Financial Rewards

 

Compelling Future

A compelling future assumes, of course, that those in company leadership know where the business is headed and how its going to get there. They have a vivid and clear vision.  They consistently communicate that vision and the strategy that is needed to fulfill it.  They have reduced the business plan of the company to an easily understood, focused strategy statement that all of the principal players in the company can articulate.   Everyone throughout the organization understands the vision and how the company is going to fulfill it. 

But this is not all.

The “best” companies have an ability to make “compelling future” come alive for their workforce.  They enable their employees to see themselves in the future of the business.   The company and its employees have a shared value system.  There is a unified financial vision for growing the enterprise that is understood by all.  Premier talent are allowed to think and believe that the business cannot achieve its vision without them.  They are allowed this view this because its an accurate one–not just something leadership says to rally the troops.  As a result, they nuture a partnership relationship with employees–particularly key producers.  Those the company needs to drive results see their unique ability as an essential ingredient to the company realizing its vision of the future.  In essence, this is why employees consider the future to be “compelling.”

Positive Work Environment

World class organizations create a culture and environment that nutures individual unique abilities within the framework of unique teams.  This means that people are placed in roles where their talent, experience, skill and wisdom allow them make the best contribution.  Their distinctive ability blends with and compliments others in their sphere of influence to create a highly productive outcome for the company and an enriching experience for the employees. The whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts.

In such an environment, innovation is encouraged and thrives.  There are open channels of communication for problem solving with company leadership and people feel empowered as stewards over their work.  Roles and expectations are clear, fair and synchronized with the company’s business plan.  A culture of execution, sustained success and confidence is nurtured, celebrated and rewarded.

Opportunities for Personal and Professional Development

Central to the definition of ”meaningful work” for employees is the ability they have to improve and advance.  Organizations that want to attract “the best” must make sure there are clear opportunities for employees to magnify their unique abilities as a result of their affiliation with the company.  This relates to everything from career path development to training and supplemental educational opportunities.  However, it also relates to challenges employees are given, a sense of stewardship they are allowed to have in their roles and the feeling of confidence that is communicated to them about their ability to make a contribution. 

 At its core, this category has to do with building trust.  The roles employees are given, how they are managed, and the way they are ultimately paid ties them to the business plan of the company and creates a sense of collaboration with ownership.  Such a relationship breeds mutual respect and unity, which are foundational to a relationship of trust.  In organizations where trust is high, results are accelerated.  As the speed of performance increases, costs go down and revenues increase.  If compensation is effectively engineered, all win and a positive, self-sustaining momentum is set in motion.

Financial Rewards

Many assume pay is the core issue for employees in determining whether to join or leave an organization.  It’s not that simple.  All of the factors described here play a role. 

At issue with pay is not usually how much someone is getting but how they are being compensated.  In other words, the best employees recognize and respond to the concept of valuation creation.  If a business creates value for its customers, the marketplace rewards that company financially by buying its product or service.  Value is received for value created.  Similarly,  employees recognize that if they create superior value, some part of their pay should reflect that.  Conversely, if they don’t create additional value, they likewise shouldn’t be paid as if they did.

Great organizations understand that value creation has both a short-term and a long-term component– for employees as well as for the company.  The business is interested in generating results today, tomorrow and through the remainder of the year. However, it is also interested in sustained results–those that will drive shareholder value over the next two to five years–even the next decade.  Consequently, they are interested in  good profits (those that come by virtue of benefiting the customer)  and not bad profits (those that come at the expense of the customer and erode good will and long-term business value).

Employees are no different .  They have short and long-term financial objectives–and look to their employment as the primary vehicle to achieve both.  In this context, employees are primarilly interested in their pay program addressing three key priorities:

  • Cash Needs/Standard of Living–this priority is typically met through salary and some type of annual incentive plan that gives the employee some control over short-term earning capacity
  • Security–this area of emphasis has to do with protecting against financial risk through adequate insurance coverage and opportunities for employees to mitigate potential risk issues in their lives
  • Wealth Accumulation–this area of focus has to do with participating in the long-term value employees help the business create and feeling empowered to “reap what they sow”; it goes beyond mechanisms such as 401(k) or pension plans that are purely retirement focused

 

These Four Pillars of a Total Rewards strategy can be a useful way to evaluate how your company is doing in positioning itself to attract the best and, as a result, become the best.  It is our experience that the businesses that “get” this also end up ”getting” the results they are looking for on their pathway towards World-Class Performance.

That is not a VisionLink claim.  It’s the claim of Jean Martin and Conrad Schmidt, both of the Corporate Executive Board’s Corporate Leadership Council in Washington, DC, as reported in their Harvard Business Review article–May 2010 edition.  The claim is based on research done by the Leadership Council in September of 2009.  It’s a staggering statistic.

Following that claim, the authors proceed to delineate the six most common errors their research produced that  contribute to this outcome: 1) Assuming that high potentials are highly engaged; 2)Equating current high performance with future potential; 3)Delegating down the management of top talent; 4) Sheilding rising stars from early derailment; 5) Expecting star employees to share the pain, and; 6) Failing to link your stars to your corporate strategy.

That last mistake (not creating links between key people and strategy) is also the basis for three of the 10 core set of best practices  the article goes on to define for identifying and managing key talent.  It is likewise reflective of the central philosophy VisionLink espouses relative the development of World Class Compensation.  Creating great rewards strategies does not begin with a discussion of compensation.  It begins with a discussion of vision, strategy, roles and expectations.  Rewards should be an extension of that train of thought.

Here are three of the best practices identified in the article, and VisionLink’s observations about each.

  • Create individual development plans; link personal objectives to the company’s plans for growth, rather than to generic competency models.

    VisionLink Observation: Compensation in high performing organizations is one of the tools that forges this link and advances a unified financial vision for growing the business.  Employees will understand this connection (between personal objectives and the company’s growth plans)  if they feel a sense of partnership in their business relationship–financially (through pay) and otherwise.

  • Reevaluate top talent annually for possible changes in ability, engagement, and aspiration levels.

    VisionLink Observation: Performance is not static and pay for performance isn’t either.  A compensation philosophy should clearly define what a company will “pay” for and practices must bring that philosophy to life.  Evaluation tools should be employed at least annually to assess engagement and aspiration levels to determine the level of alignment that is taking place.

  • Offer significantly differentiated compensation and recognition to star employees.

    VisionLink Observation: This is the basis of a pay for performance philosophy and the heart of world-class compensation.  Star companies are fueled by star employees. If the business is performing above the market, premier talent will know that, and will expect to be paid accordingly.  If star performance isn’t being achieved, review the previous bullet point.

As companies begin to emerge from the deep sleep imposed by the recent economic slump, they would do well to make sure they are avoiding the mistakes Jean Martin and Conrad Schmidt have identified.  Equally, they should ensure they are well poised to employ the critical components of a world class talent-development program.