Building Unified Financial Visions

Companies that struggle with building effective compensation strategies are often ascribing an unrealistic expectation to their rewards programs.  They want compensation to be a motivation tool; one that will impact behavior  and create change.  They are often disappointed when they don’t see quantum leaps in performance and productivity.  They subsequently label the latest incentive plan attempt “dead on arrival” and begin cursing the “compensation gods.”

What these companies don’t often recognize is that their attempt at motivation came across as manipulation to their employees.  It’s a fine line, and it is easily crossed.   Premier talent has an intrinsic sense of purpose and recognizes the value it brings to the table.  These individuals are motivated by mission and opportunity, not by financial rewards. As a result, they are not relying on a compensation program to trigger their passion.  However, they are looking  for a sense of partnership–and the company’s compensation programs become a  key validator of that message.  You see, partnership is linked to opportunity–and that is motivating to the kind of people most companies want to attract. 

Partnership is more than pay, but pay is a key component of partnership if it is given the right frame of reference.  Compensation needs to be viewed as a means of creating a unified financial vision for growing the business.  It is built in parallel with the vision, mission and strategy of the organization.  It is an extension of the business plan and defines the financial parameters of the partnership relationship the company has with its key people. 

Companies that embrace the partnership concept understand the critical nature of having a compensation philosophy statement.  That written document defines what the company pays for.  It communicate the balance the business seeks to strike between guaranteed versus at risk compensation, and short-term versus long-term rewards.  It ties short and long-term incentives to the concept of good versus bad profits, and uses the compensation construct to encourage more of the former and less of the latter.  Such definitions are critical ingredients of a sound financial partnership and offer insight to the parties involved into the best means of fulfilling the partnership’s potential.

A foundational philosophy statement provides a lauching pad for examining the components of pay that should be included in defining the partnership relationship the company wishes to have with its best people.  Salary, short-term incentives, long-term incentives, equity, phantom equity, health and welfare plans, retirement benefits and executive benefits are all weighed and evaluated in the context of partnership.  “What plans will drive performance, increase shareholder value, and meet the cash and wealth accumulation objectives of our most critical partners–our employees?”

When a company begins to think and act in these terms, it will turn the corner in its understanding of the power of compensation to be transformational in its impact.

So…when you think about compensation, think parternship, not motivation.

Ken Gibson
January 18th, 2010 by Ken Gibson

Why Not Have a World-Class Compensation Plan?

I assume that as you approach each new year, you don’t think about your business in modest terms.   Presumably, you have big plans, and are trying to renew your employees’ vision of the possibilities.  Breakthrough growth.  New thresholds of success.  Expanded sales and market share.  Increased profitablity.  Greater shareholder value.

With that vision in mind, you are likely trying to effectively communicate your vision to your key people. You want them to understand why that future is important and how confident you are that it can happen, with their help.  To that end, you might be holding team meetings, sending letters or intranet communications, inviting key individuals to lunch and generally trying to ignite a fire that will translate into execution and results that reflect the potential you have imagined.

Now, with such goals in mind, can you fathom any successful business leader standing in front of his team and giving a speech that goes something like this?

“This year our target is to do about as well as our competition.  We’ve studied what they are doing and hope to mirror their plan as closely as we can.  If we carefully manage expenses and make sure we keep our costs down, we should be okay.”

You are laughing right now, right?  Well, laughable or not, while that may not be the way an owner, CEO or company president approaches the communication of his business vision, it too often reflects his approach to compensation design–the one strategic tool that best communicates the relationship between vision, business plan, roles, expectations and rewards.

To make the point clearer, here are some common assersions or questions we often hear early on in our discussion with  potential clients.

  • How many clients do you have in our industry?
  • Can you do a market pay study for us?
  • Is there a lower cost approach we could take?
  • We don’t really want to add anything to our compensation budget, so please keep that in mind as you help us develop new plans
  • HR handles compensation issues, you should talk to them

There are more, but you get the idea.  Can you see the obvious disconnect between these comments and a company that is trying to achieve breakthrough performance?

Compensation is usually the largest budget item for a business.  Company cash is going to be used for that purpose one way or another.  The key question is, will  it be used as strategically as every other investment in the business, or will it be relegated  to just another expense that has to be managed? 

If you have applied your energy towards becoming a world-class organization with a clear competitive advantage, why would you not apply the same focus to compensation development?  If you need to attract great talent to become a great company, why would you not offer them a world-class compensation plan?

If you are thinking that “world-class” means expensive (as in world-class hotels, first class travel, etc.), then think again.  A world class compensation strategy might simply be described as follows:

The business is committed to a compensation strategy that is fully integrated with the business plan and offers a clear competitive advantage in recruiting and retaining top talent.

Having an integrated compensation strategy simply means there is a relationship between how people are paid and the achievement of the strategic goals of the organization.  Compensation is an outcome based endeavor.  In a world-class environment, those outcomes might include the following:

  • Productivity: Employee engagement and commitment reflect an ownership-like determination to drive growth, profits and shareholder value. (Owner statement–”Employees understand the company’s future and are committed to helping fulfill it because they have a vested interest in helping it succeed.”)
  • Talent: Great talent is attracted to and remains with the company because they feel passionate about their role in the future of the organization.  (Owner statement–”Employees believe in the company’s ability to achieve its targets and that their contribution is vital.”)
  • Measures: The cost, impact, and operational efficiency of all compensation/benefits programs are managed, monitored, measured and consistently improved. (Owner statement–”We regularly evaluate and employ mechanisms by which we can improve our systems, drive productivity and save money.”)

In a company with a “world-class” mindset, the speech given by the owner, CEO or president might sound more like the following:

“This year we anticipate having record performance.  Building on our past success, as well as the strength of the greatest talent in our industry, we expect to secure a leadership position in our market space and achieve our most ambitious goals.  You are a critical part of the future of this organization.  We can’t achieve our goals without you.  As a result, I want to make sure you understand the rewards you will enjoy if we can all work hard and achieve the performance levels we have targeted.  This year, in addition to your salary, you will pariticipate in two incentive plans–one short-term in nature and the other long-term.  Both will put you in greater control of  the financial results you can realize if we can achieve the goals we have set.”

Such a speech can only be given by a leader that understands the relationship between performance and pay, and the importance of carefully tying the two together in the value proposition employees are offered.  Such a speech will also attract great people–individuals that relate to the idea of building something and want to know that their contribution is vital.  Such individuals feel valued and counted upon, as a result, they execute differently.

So, as you approach this new year, think in terms of new standards–not just in the goals you set or the initiatives you launch, but also in the way you reward performance.  Build a world-class compensation plan.

Ken Gibson
January 5th, 2010 by Ken Gibson

Peter Drucker Agrees with VisionLink

Okay, so Peter Drucker never really knew VisionLink.  That’s a detail.  However, his philosophy about pay at the executive and management level was “spot on” with what we believe should be a core tenet of rewards design:

Build world class compensation strategies that are rooted in pay for performance and drive measureable results.

In her November, 2009 HBR article entitled, “What Would Peter Say?” Rosabeth Moss Kanter shares the following insights into Drucker’s thinking regarding the recent executive pay brouhaha.

“Drucker would not have been surprised that incentives to take excessive risks contributed to the recent global financial meltdown.  Back in the mid-1980s, he warned about a public outcry over executive compensation…More than 20 years ago, Drucker pointed to a top-to-bottom ratio that was then rushing past 40 to 1.  Just before his death, the ratio was greater than 400 to 1.

“Drucker was not against wealth accumulation, but he was pragmatic about the work of organizations and society.  He held that the role of executives was to coordinate the actions of others whose motivation (and thus compensation) was necessary to get the job done.  But he also held that pay should be associated with performance; that was a major point of management by objectives, perhaps his most practical management contribution. Listening to Drucker might have headed off some of the excesses associated with Wall Street…in which bonuses not only were decried for their amounts but also were uncorrelated with company results…”

I suspect that most company leaders would find themselves in agreement with much if not all of the issues Drucker raises.  However, although many agree with a performance/pay correlation philosophy in principle, few are translating that belief system into consistent compensation practices.  Fewer still achieve a rewards strategy that could be considered “world-class”; one that places them in the competitive advantage driver’s seat.  A world class pay plan is one that fully integrates compensation into the business plan of the company and creates a seamless link between vision, strategy, roles, expectations and rewards.

What most companies need to bridge the gap between where they are now and where they should (and, hopefully, want to) be is a Missing Structure; a system or process that helps them effectively engineer compensation strategies that impact execution and results.   In our experience, that Missing Structure needs to include the following comp0nents:

  • CEO/Board Level Leadership and Involvement
  • A Clear and Written Pay Philosophy
  • A Comprehensive Compensation Gameplan
  • Fully Integrated and Correlated Pay Strategies and Plans
  • Consistently Executed “Line of Sight” Review

These steps ensure a cohesive, consistent approach to talent attraction, retention and development.  Likewise, they provide checks and balances that protect the company from sacrificing good profits for bad or that substitute short- term performance bursts for sustained results.  When properly executed, these measures make sure that all incentive plans are self financed and pay benefits that are correlated with increased shareholder value, and other critical measures.

Many of the companies that have made headlines in recent years lost sight of these important principles as it relates to compensation development and management.  Again, Peter Drucker’s observation is a correct one.  He stressed that:

“…ensuring the long-term health of the company–and eschewing short hits that jeopardize the future–is executives’ primary job.”

We are happy to know that Peter Drucker agrees with us.